⬡ Vespiary
Photo of Noam Chomsky

Photo: Σ, retouched by Wugapodes & Jonnmann, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Noam Chomsky public figure — reconstructed profile

This is a reconstruction from published statements, not a real account. Only questions with a documented position are answered, and each one cites its source below. Spotted an error? Bring a better citation to the forum and it gets fixed.

Linguist & political critic (Manufacturing Consent, 1988). Positions from his published works and interviews — not a member.

answered 32 questions

—
Kindred % · overall match
—
Twin % · thinks like you
—
World % · lives in your world
—
Life % · lives like you
—
Opposition % · opposite poles, held with certainty
—
Bubble

Positions & sources

QuestionPositionSource
Picture an ordinary person in 1850, kind by their own standards, who took part in a practice nearly everyone around them accepted and never seriously questioned it. Stipulate: we now regard it as a wrong as grave as slavery, and our current judgment is correct. How blameworthy were they?SubstantiallyYear 501 (1993) and his historical writings — slave-era figures are condemned by standards he treats as timeless; contemporaries (abolitionists) prove the knowledge was available. (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
Which comes closest to your actual position on God?Probably no god, though I can't be certainInterviews — stated atheism.
Human-caused climate change is best described as:Real, mainly human-caused, and a serious problemClimate Crisis and the Global Green New Deal (2020, with Robert Pollin).
The standard childhood vaccine schedule, taken as a whole:Does far more good than harmInterviews (2021) — defended vaccination; said the unvaccinated endanger the community.
You read a long essay arguing a policy claim, find it persuasive, and can't find a factual error. You then learn it was commissioned and paid for by an organization whose goals you oppose, and its author writes only for them. Stipulate: no claim in it has been shown false. Compared with right after reading, your confidence in its conclusion:Falls back to where it was before I read itManufacturing Consent (1988) — content produced solely for an interested party is filtered by construction; its persuasiveness is expected even when the claim is false. (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
When a major event dominates the news, how much of the official account is usually deliberate deception?A substantial part — key facts are routinely hiddenManufacturing Consent (1988) — the propaganda model's filters routinely hide key facts (index 2, not higher: his model is filtering, not wholesale fabrication).
Humans came to exist by:Evolution by natural processes, no guidance neededHis public defense of evolutionary science.
Abortion should be:Legal in most circumstances, with few restrictionsUlysses Medal address, University College Dublin (reported by the Irish Times) — abortion restrictions as "attacks on women's rights"; Lake of Fire (documentary, 2006) — "choice is legitimate."
A society with more guns in civilian hands is, on net:Much more dangerousSecrets, Lies, and Democracy (1994) — "Guns in the hands of American citizens are not going to make the country more benign. They're going to make it more brutal, ruthless and destructive."
By 2200, nearly everyone regards a practice you take part in today as a wrong as grave as slavery. Stipulate: nearly everyone around you accepts it now, you've never seriously questioned it, and the 2200 judgment is correct. How blameworthy are you for your participation up to now?Substantially"The Responsibility of Intellectuals" (1967) — he insists the same standards be applied to present-day actors, oneself included. (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
The best economic order is closest to:Comprehensive public/collective ownership of the means of productionOn Anarchism (2013) — the libertarian-socialist goal of collective/worker control of production (closest available option to his documented ideal).
Mainstream news outlets, taken as a whole, mostly:Systematically distort through bias and incentives, without needing ordersManufacturing Consent (1988) — the five filters; this is the propaganda model's literal thesis.
In an upcoming national election, your vote has roughly a 1-in-10-million chance of deciding the outcome, and voting will cost you about two hours. Stipulate: you care which side wins. You:Vote, mainly because a tiny chance times very high stakes is worth two hoursHis 2016 and 2020 "lesser-evil voting" statements — vote (especially in swing states) because the difference in outcomes is enormous: a consequentialist voting rationale. (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
Twenty years from now, advanced AI will most likely have been:Net harmful — disruption and harm outweigh the gainsNew York Times op-ed (March 2023) — current AI as a degradation of science and education.
You read a long essay arguing a policy claim, find it persuasive, and can't find a factual error. You then learn it was commissioned and paid for by an organization whose goals you support, and its author writes only for them. Stipulate: no claim in it has been shown false. Compared with right after reading, your confidence in its conclusion:Falls back to where it was before I read itManufacturing Consent (1988) — the model is side-neutral; the filters apply to all institutional sources. (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
Organized religion's overall effect on society has been:Mixed to neutral — depends entirely on the religion and eraInterviews — he praises liberation theology and religious activists while rejecting doctrine; religion's effects depend on its use.
God existsProbably falseInterviews on science and religion — he identifies as an atheist while noting the limits of what can be known.
Conscious existence continues after deathProbably falseHis materialist stance across interviews; no survival doctrine is anywhere expressed.
Prayer can change what happens in the world, beyond its effects on the people involvedProbably falseTalks on science and religion — supernatural intervention has no evidential standing.
Human beings arose entirely through unguided natural processesCertainly trueHis lifelong public defense of evolutionary science (interviews and writings on science).
Consciousness is produced entirely by the brainGenuinely unsure"The Mysteries of Nature: How Deeply Hidden?", Journal of Philosophy (2009) — consciousness may be a mystery permanently beyond human cognitive reach; he declines both confident materialism and dualism.
With the past exactly the same, our choices could have gone otherwiseProbably true"Language and Freedom" (1970) and interviews — free will treated as a real feature of human nature that science cannot yet explain.
Some actions are wrong no matter what any person or culture believesProbably true"The Responsibility of Intellectuals" (1967) and his moral-universalism talks — basic moral principles are universal and rooted in human nature.
We owe a stranger overseas as much as we owe a neighborProbably trueOn Anarchism (2013) — solidarity and mutual responsibility extend universally.
Free markets do more to reduce poverty than government programs doCertainly falseProfit Over People (1999) — free-market ("neoliberal") doctrine blamed for entrenching poverty and inequality.
Long-standing traditions usually contain wisdom we can't seeProbably falseOn Anarchism (2013) — inherited authority must justify itself or be dismantled; tradition confers no legitimacy.
Advanced AI poses a serious risk of human extinctionProbably falseNew York Times op-ed, "The False Promise of ChatGPT" (March 8, 2023) — current AI is not genuine intelligence; extinction discourse is misplaced hype.
People in 2100 will live better lives than people do todayProbably falseRequiem for the American Dream (2017) and interviews (2020–2023) — humanity at its most dangerous moment (climate, nuclear weapons).
Human life has a purpose beyond the one we choose for itProbably falseInterviews — meaning and purpose are human creations within his atheist/humanist frame.
Most people are basically goodProbably true"Language and Freedom" (1970) — anarchism presupposes a benign, creative human nature.
Experts are usually right about questions in their own fieldProbably false"The Responsibility of Intellectuals" (1967) — credentialed experts characteristically serve power; deference to them is unwarranted.
Official institutions are honest with the publicCertainly falseManufacturing Consent (1988, with Edward S. Herman) — state and corporate institutions systematically deceive the public.