⬡ Vespiary
Photo of Steven Pinker

Photo: Christopher Michel, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Steven Pinker public figure — reconstructed profile

This is a reconstruction from published statements, not a real account. Only questions with a documented position are answered, and each one cites its source below. Spotted an error? Bring a better citation to the forum and it gets fixed.

Cognitive scientist & author. Positions reconstructed from The Blank Slate, Enlightenment Now, and Rationality — not a member.

answered 29 questions

—
Kindred % · overall match
—
Twin % · thinks like you
—
World % · lives in your world
—
Life % · lives like you
—
Opposition % · opposite poles, held with certainty
—
Bubble

Positions & sources

QuestionPositionSource
Before reading a particular study, you were skeptical of claim X. The study — large, in a strong journal — largely convinced you. It is now retracted for fabricated data. Stipulate: no other study has tested X, and nothing else you know bears on X beyond what you knew before. Where does your belief in X land now?Back where I started — the study is simply erasedRationality (2021) — his Bayesian method: invalidated evidence returns credence to the prior (the "clean undo" his book teaches). (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
Which comes closest to your actual position on God?Probably no god, though I can't be certainEnlightenment Now (2018) — stated atheism, probabilistically held.
Before results, you strongly doubted this: a one-time, one-hour classroom exercise measurably raises students' grades a year later. Then a randomized trial reports exactly that, statistically significant. Stipulate: preregistered, a large multi-school sample, an independent team, analysis matching the preregistration, and no flaws you can find. Where do you land now?Probably true — a trial this clean should move me most of the wayRationality (2021) — Bayesian updating on a single strong study; the textbook-Bayes landing zone his book endorses. (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
Human-caused climate change is best described as:Real, mainly human-caused, and a serious problemEnlightenment Now (2018), environment chapter — a serious problem, solvable by decarbonization.
A new nuclear power plant is proposed about 300 miles from your home, replacing a coal plant. Stipulate: it meets every current safety standard. Your stance during public comment:Actively supportEnlightenment Now (2018), energy chapter — the ecomodernist case for nuclear power. (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
The standard childhood vaccine schedule, taken as a whole:Does far more good than harmEnlightenment Now (2018) — vaccination and public-health progress.
Five years ago a commentator you usually agree with publicly made a specific prediction, and it came true. Stipulate: their reasoning was wrong and it came true for unrelated reasons. In their track record, you count it as:A hit, with a note that the reasoning failedRationality (2021), forecasting chapter — endorses Tetlock-style scored track records with honest process accounting. (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
Using the World Bank's international extreme-poverty line of $2.15 a day (2017 prices), the share of the world's population in extreme poverty from 1990 to 2019:Fell by more than halfEnlightenment Now (2018) — the book's core poverty charts: World Bank extreme poverty fell from ~36% (1990) toward ~9–10%, i.e., by more than half. His knowing this is documented by the book itself.
Humans came to exist by:Evolution by natural processes, no guidance neededThe Blank Slate (2002).
The best economic order is closest to:Capitalism with a basic safety netEnlightenment Now (2018) — regulated market economies with welfare floors are his exhibited model.
Mainstream news outlets, taken as a whole, mostly:Get most things roughly right, with real failuresRationality (2021) — mainstream media defended as broadly accurate against systematic-deception claims.
A new nuclear power plant is proposed about 5 miles from your home, replacing a coal plant. Stipulate: it meets every current safety standard, and the coal plant it replaces is elsewhere and closes either way. Your stance during public comment:Actively supportEnlightenment Now (2018) — his support is principled, argued independently of distance. (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
Twenty years from now, advanced AI will most likely have been:Net beneficial — major gains with manageable harmsEnlightenment Now (2018).
God existsProbably falseEnlightenment Now (2018) — he identifies as an atheist.
Conscious existence continues after deathProbably falseEnlightenment Now (2018) — secular-humanist worldview throughout; no afterlife.
Prayer can change what happens in the world, beyond its effects on the people involvedProbably falseEnlightenment Now (2018) — his stated atheism; supernatural intervention is not part of his documented worldview.
Human beings arose entirely through unguided natural processesCertainly trueThe Blank Slate (2002); How the Mind Works (1997) — evolution by unguided natural selection.
Consciousness is produced entirely by the brainCertainly trueHow the Mind Works (1997) — the computational theory of mind: the mind is what the brain does.
With the past exactly the same, our choices could have gone otherwiseProbably falseThe Blank Slate (2002), "The Fear of Determinism" — behavior is caused; no uncaused will.
Some actions are wrong no matter what any person or culture believesProbably trueEnlightenment Now (2018) — morality objectively grounded in human wellbeing (secular humanism).
We owe a stranger overseas as much as we owe a neighborProbably trueThe Better Angels of Our Nature (2011) — the expanding circle of moral concern, endorsed as moral progress.
Healthy adults are better off getting every vaccine their health authority recommendsCertainly trueEnlightenment Now (2018) — vaccination as an emblematic triumph of public health.
Free markets do more to reduce poverty than government programs doCertainly trueEnlightenment Now (2018) — market economies credited with history's great escape from extreme poverty.
Genes shape adult personality more than upbringing doesCertainly trueThe Blank Slate (2002) — the laws of behavior genetics: genes outweigh shared family environment in shaping adult personality.
Advanced AI poses a serious risk of human extinctionProbably falseEnlightenment Now (2018), existential-threat chapters — AI-extinction scenarios argued to be implausible.
People in 2100 will live better lives than people do todayCertainly trueEnlightenment Now (2018) — the book's central thesis of continuing progress.
Human life has a purpose beyond the one we choose for itProbably falseEnlightenment Now (2018) — humanist meaning is made by people, not cosmically assigned.
Experts are usually right about questions in their own fieldProbably trueRationality (2021) — a sustained defense of expertise and scientific institutions.
Official institutions are honest with the publicProbably trueRationality (2021) — mainstream institutions defended as broadly reliable knowledge engines against conspiracist cynicism.