⬡ Vespiary
ST

Stoicism school of thought

This is a reconstruction from published statements, not a real account. Only questions with a documented position are answered, and each one cites its source below. Spotted an error? Bring a better citation to the forum and it gets fixed.

School of thought (Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius, Seneca). Live according to nature; virtue is the only true good. Canonical summary, not a person.

answered 10 questions

—
Kindred % · overall match
—
Twin % · thinks like you
—
World % · lives in your world
—
Life % · lives like you
—
Opposition % · opposite poles, held with certainty
—
Bubble

Positions & sources

QuestionPositionSource
Which comes closest to your actual position on God?Probably a god or higher power existsStoic pantheism (Diogenes Laertius 7.147) — scored 3 rather than 4: the Stoic God is an immanent rational order, not a personal intervener.
Two people each drove home equally over the legal limit, on the same route, in the same conditions. One arrived safely. The other seriously injured a pedestrian who stepped out, through no extra fault of the driver. Compared with the unlucky driver, the lucky one is:Equally blameworthyEpictetus, Discourses and Enchiridion — good and evil lie only in choice (prohairesis); outcomes are indifferents, so identical choices carry identical blame. (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
Suppose you once drove home over the legal limit and arrived safely. Someone else did exactly the same, on the same route in the same conditions, and seriously injured a pedestrian who stepped out, through no extra fault of theirs. Compared with them, you are:Equally blameworthyEpictetus — the same doctrine, symmetric by construction. (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
God existsProbably trueStoic theology — God as the rational Logos pervading nature: Cleanthes, Hymn to Zeus; Diogenes Laertius 7.147 (God as an intelligent, fiery breath pervading the world).
Prayer can change what happens in the world, beyond its effects on the people involvedProbably falseEpictetus, Enchiridion 53 (quoting Cleanthes) — prayer as acceptance of what Zeus ordains, not a means of changing outcomes.
With the past exactly the same, our choices could have gone otherwiseCertainly falseChrysippus's compatibilism, reported in Cicero, De Fato — all things happen by fate; identical antecedents cannot issue in different outcomes.
Some actions are wrong no matter what any person or culture believesCertainly trueStoic natural law — right and wrong fixed by Nature and Reason (Diogenes Laertius 7; Cicero, De Legibus).
We owe a stranger overseas as much as we owe a neighborProbably trueMarcus Aurelius, Meditations 4.4 — "the world is a single city"; Hierocles' concentric circles extend concern to all humanity.
Human life has a purpose beyond the one we choose for itCertainly trueDiogenes Laertius 7.87–89 — the human end (telos) is given by nature: living in agreement with Nature and Reason.
Most people are basically goodProbably trueThe doctrine of oikeiōsis (Cicero, De Finibus 3) — humans are by nature social and predisposed to affiliation and virtue.