⬡ Vespiary
UT

Utilitarianism school of thought

This is a reconstruction from published statements, not a real account. Only questions with a documented position are answered, and each one cites its source below. Spotted an error? Bring a better citation to the forum and it gets fixed.

School of thought (Bentham, Mill). The right act is the one with the best consequences for everyone's wellbeing. Canonical summary.

answered 5 questions

—
Kindred % · overall match
—
Twin % · thinks like you
—
World % · lives in your world
—
Life % · lives like you
—
Opposition % · opposite poles, held with certainty
—
Bubble

Positions & sources

QuestionPositionSource
A dying friend gives you $10,000 in cash and makes you promise to deliver it to their estranged brother, who is comfortably off. Stipulate: no one else knows, your friend would have refused a charity alternative, and a top-rated global health charity would save about two lives with the money. You:Donate it all to the charityThe school's defining principle (Bentham, 1789; Mill, 1863) — the right act maximizes wellbeing; two lives outweigh a promise to a comfortably-off man, and the promise's value counts only through its consequences. (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
In an upcoming national election, your vote has roughly a 1-in-10-million chance of deciding the outcome, and voting will cost you about two hours. Stipulate: you care which side wins. You:Vote, mainly because a tiny chance times very high stakes is worth two hoursParfit, Reasons and Persons (1984) — the school's canonical modern treatment of tiny probabilities, vast stakes, and contributions to collective outcomes. (scenario answer — inferred from their documented positions, not a recorded statement)
Some actions are wrong no matter what any person or culture believesCertainly trueBentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789) — actions are right or wrong by their tendency to augment or diminish happiness: a standard independent of anyone's beliefs about it.
We owe a stranger overseas as much as we owe a neighborCertainly trueBentham's dictum as reported by Mill, Utilitarianism (1863) — "each to count for one, and none for more than one": the impartiality axiom.
Long-standing traditions usually contain wisdom we can't seeCertainly falseBentham, The Book of Fallacies (1824) — deference to "the wisdom of ancestors" is one of his named political fallacies.